WASHINGTON, DC, 03:44 AM, TUE NOVEMBER 24 | Advertise on Wonkette | tips@wonkette.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS
MYSTERIES

Ron Paul’s R3LOVElution Slogan Missing Crucial Element, Or Else What Is Up With This Car?

The most mysterious car since Kit from Knight RiderReader “Emily” sends us this mysterious photo from Chicago, which appears to be a Paultard car, only without the R at the beginning of Dr. Paul’s famous slogan. “I still really couldn’t believe this was a thing,” she writes. So, question: IS THIS A THING?


10:10 AM on Wed June 3 2009
By Sara K. Smith
1705 Views

  1. Aloysius says at 10:14 am, June 3rd, 2009

    VW hasn’t made a Thing in quite some time. Is that a Mustang? Didn’t Burt Reynolds drive one of those?

  2. ManchuCandidate says at 10:14 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Hey, this guy (it HAS to be a guy) is living to his libertarian principals (sic) in the widest way possible. It’s deregulated spelling and no gubbiment is going to tell him how to spel whuds.

  3. HoboNutz says at 10:15 am, June 3rd, 2009

    no. no it is not.

  4. Serious says at 10:15 am, June 3rd, 2009

    This is why I always put my decals on my windshield.

  5. the problem child says at 10:15 am, June 3rd, 2009

    I love evolution too!

  6. It certainly seems thing-like, though badly misspelled. I think the ‘R’ would’ve been too close to the door crack. Eh, leave it to Paultards to muff the type blocking.

  7. Canmon (the Inadequate) says at 10:17 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Instead of “revolution” it is “evolution”. The driver loves Ron Paul but just wants to take things a little slower.

  8. WadISay says at 10:18 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Aloysius: Yes, ugh, start the 3VOLution without me.

  9. Chickensmack says at 10:18 am, June 3rd, 2009

    by default, aren’t we already a part of 3VOLUTION? Maybe it’s one of those “Save ‘Em All” campaigns by a heavy metal contemporary Christian band.

  10. hockeymom says at 10:18 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Is that a GM product? Do I now own part of that car?

  11. Vulpes82 says at 10:19 am, June 3rd, 2009

    “IS THIS A THING?” No, but it is Das Ding an sich. Ponder that!

  12. hobospacejunkie says at 10:20 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Is that one of the many copies, made for the show, of the new Knightrider KIT car? Can’t wait to see it at Univeral Studios as a main attraction on their tour, years after the show’s been cancelled.

  13. facehead says at 10:22 am, June 3rd, 2009

    No entity without identity.

  14. ManchuCandidate says at 10:24 am, June 3rd, 2009

    hobospacejunkie:
    I’m guessing KITT would drive itself off a cliff if it had that sticker on its door panel.

  15. 19kevin8 says at 10:24 am, June 3rd, 2009

    The 3volution will not be televised. Instead, it will appear in mysterious, fogged lens photos of crappy Fords.

  16. MARCdMan says at 10:28 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Typical Ford owner, spell about as well as their cars drive.

  17. ladymacbeth says at 10:29 am, June 3rd, 2009

    no this is all wrong. that car is simply part of the darwin bicentennial.

  18. oldguy says at 10:30 am, June 3rd, 2009

    But if it’s a Ding, we can’t know it, although we may owkn it (I’m embracing libraritarian spelukn too.) And do Dings 3volve or were they created by a not-too-brite desiner?

  19. Yes, it is a thing; so are all cars, being nonliving physical objects (except the aforementioned Kitt, who is alive).

  20. catsquatch says at 10:34 am, June 3rd, 2009

    The Granolesbodarwin Abortion party is now picking over the corpse of the Paultards, since the whole Jesus fish with legs thing hasn’t really worked out for them.

  21. doxastic says at 10:34 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Vulpes82: It is definitely a thing-in-itself.

    DOUBLE NERDATION: “The presence of something present such as the [late-model Ford Mustang] comes into its own, appropriatively manifests and determines itself, only from the thinging of the thing.” Unfortunately, this guy hasn’t thinged a thing without paying in years.

  22. catsquatch says at 10:36 am, June 3rd, 2009

    ladymacbeth: That will teach me to try to work in another window when I should be commenting.

  23. Mahousu says at 10:36 am, June 3rd, 2009

    That’s not a Mitsubishi Evo by any chance, is it? (Sorry, my car recognition skills are a bit subpar.) That would provide a (boring) explanation.

  24. nappyduggs says at 10:39 am, June 3rd, 2009

    I’m still mulling over the “thingyness” of it, but if there was a rear-view picture of the car in question with mudflaps featuring a silhouetted Dr. Paul with his erectd penis supporting the Constipatution then I would definitely say’yes-yes this is a thing.’

  25. doxastic: Triple Nerd Score!: It is the thing and the whole of the thing.

  26. Urbanachiever says at 10:43 am, June 3rd, 2009

    What a crappy parking job–it looks like it’s blocking half the alley entrance!

  27. Roger the Shrubber says at 10:44 am, June 3rd, 2009

    It may be a type of thing rather than an instance of a thing. Then again, it might just be an attribute.

  28. SayItWithWookies says at 10:45 am, June 3rd, 2009

    If this is a thing, then it’s a misguided attempt to popularize the evil scientific rationalist agenda — it’s not like Ron Paulism is more popular than science already. If they really want to popularize evolution, they should associate it with something wildly popular and somewhat related — steak, for instance. Couldn’t you picture a little biology lesson on all your grilling meats?

  29. stuffisthings says at 10:46 am, June 3rd, 2009

    I want to pronounce it “THREEvolution,” which I imagine must be a branch of science similar to THREEconomics. So presumably this car is owned by a THREEnvironmentalist who eats only at Wendys.

    Also: I’m glad to find out that asking if a thing is “a thing” is actually a thing!

  30. doxastic says at 10:49 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Roger the Shrubber: It’s definitely an accident.

  31. He’s “being a part” of the Revolution. Just not the part with the R.

  32. Mr Blifil says at 10:55 am, June 3rd, 2009

    I have to recuse myself because I have a thing for things. And also I gotta go to a thing. That’s the thing.

  33. you cannot be serious says at 10:55 am, June 3rd, 2009

    The R mysteriously disappeared on Talk Like a Pirate Day.

  34. Apparently, the car hopes one day to be a seaplane.

  35. Hominidx says at 11:04 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Hello, people! It’s ELVISlution!

  36. WIDTAP says at 11:04 am, June 3rd, 2009

    It’s not so much a “thing” as a “happening”, a “rave” or a “rage”, depending on who was president when you were 17. I suppose the current 17-years-olds refer to it as a “skidoosh”.

  37. Ugh, deport all libertarians to Somalia. They will “3VOL” it there.

  38. Come here a minute says at 11:06 am, June 3rd, 2009

    It is nothing (the opposite of being a thing). Some fun cutting and pasting though.

  39. Hominidx: Hey, you leave the guy who died on the shitter in my fair city out of this.

  40. Monsieur Grumpe says at 11:09 am, June 3rd, 2009

    It’s a blimp with wheels. I understand it gets very good mileage but you don’t want in one if you have an accident. Probably sucks in snow.

  41. CockedAle says at 11:10 am, June 3rd, 2009

    I say it’s missing a “D,” not an “R”…

  42. George Will's Bow Tie says at 11:16 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Idiocy: Be a part of it!

  43. x111e7thst says at 11:19 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Vulpes82: I like to keep my Ding an Sich firmly in hand if you know what I mean. and I think you do.

  44. GDTRFB says at 11:23 am, June 3rd, 2009

    ladymacbeth: Darwin-tard? OMG there are so many “natural selection” jokes churning through my brain that I’m on the verge of a meltdown.

  45. user-of-owls says at 11:26 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Sometimes a thing is just a thing.

  46. lawrenceofthedesert says at 11:31 am, June 3rd, 2009

    The car belongs to an 80’s punk rocker who is waiting for the “D” he ordered to arrive. The tipoff was the bumper sticker (not pictured) that said, “My other car is a B-52.”

  47. tonytonytony says at 11:33 am, June 3rd, 2009

    To answer your question, it IS a thing. There is a Paultard with a similar logo on the back of his (her? maybe it’s his girlfriend) Jeep in my neighborhood, complete with an R. What I don’t get is, does Ron Paul like LOVE, or backwards LOVE? That would be just another Paul-ian insult to traditional Republican values.

  48. facehead says at 11:45 am, June 3rd, 2009

    It is what Paultards call a “flightless blimp.” Hence no ‘R.’

  49. lawrenceofthedesert says at 11:51 am, June 3rd, 2009

    CockedAle: Your comment hadn’t posted yet when I wrote my comment and stepped on your joke — unfortunate coincidence.

  50. Pompous Magnus says at 11:58 am, June 3rd, 2009

    Ceci n’est pas une thing.

  51. Mustang says at 12:19 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    The logo is evolving. HAHAHAHa

  52. PotentPotable says at 12:24 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    I’m 99.9% sure the owner means “Evolution”, as in the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The only confusing part is that I don’t think it’s an Evo. I think it’s a 3000GT, which may have evolved into the Evo.

    But, hey, why let details get in the way of ad hominem attacks, eh?

  53. CockedAle says at 12:25 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    lawrenceofthedesert: Great minds snark alike.

  54. Vulpes82 says at 12:43 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    x111e7thst: I keep mine in my “categorial imperative.” “Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more!”

  55. kappakid says at 12:50 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Yes! I drive past the car every day in Roscoe Village. Paultards should take over our esteemed city council.

  56. One Yield Regular says at 12:51 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Check the rear of the car. If it has one of those Darwin-fish thingies stuck on it, leave it be. If not, call the bomb squad.

  57. Zadig says at 1:33 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Vulpes82: Ew, no thanks, I’m a utilitatian.

  58. Bruno says at 1:44 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    This car is a farce. Anyone knows the bible says everything was created in 7 days, even cars, which roamed free with the dinosaurs. Noah had to save something, so he saved the cars, leaving the dinosaur poo behind to power them.

  59. Vulpes82 says at 1:46 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Zadig: Oooooh, felicific calculus makes me hot! (And I have no idea what I’m even saying anymore, so I suppose it’s best to end the philosophy double entendres here, before the Ban Hammer comes down.)

  60. Balls! says at 1:57 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Tra: That reminded me of a joke: I love country music, but only the first syllable

  61. Lazy Media says at 2:27 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Jeez, the lengths people will go not to put a Darwin fish on their car.

  62. stuffisthings: If you say it that way, you have to give Pat Riley a dollar.

  63. goodluck/badluck says at 6:46 pm, June 3rd, 2009

    Vagina Doctor Ron Paul is angry because he isn’t able to practice his 3VOL with women all across the country.

    As for the car, it would be thingier if had something more than a dropped-’r'… like “NUT LOTION” with a red ‘L’, say.

Leave a Reply