WASHINGTON, DC, 10:18 PM, MON NOVEMBER 23 | Advertise on Wonkette | tips@wonkette.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS
BEGGARS

  • FINE: Our dear friend Jon Swift is very angry at your Wonkette for our endorsements in four of the 8,000,000 Weblog Awards categories, because some up-and-coming blogs that would have all lost to horrific PUMA blogs will now simply lose to other blogs. In other words, Jon Swift is mad that he is losing to our hilarious weekly columnist in the Best Humor Blog category. Both are great blogs deserving of the award, OK? JESUS, what do you people want from us? Oh that’s right, Jon Swift has e-mailed us asking for our endorsement so that he too can artificially win, so go vote for him right now, and then everything will be fair again! Damnit now Josh will be mad. [Weblog Awards]


3:53 PM on Thu January 8 2009
By Jim Newell
1671 Views

  1. IceCreamEmpress says at 3:57 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Well, maybe Jon Swift should try being funny every now and then. I tend to go for the funny when I’m casting my meaningless fake vote for a meaningless fake humor award that isn’t worth the pixels it’s printed on.

  2. CivicHoliday says at 3:59 pm, January 8th, 2009

    “A vote for Jon Swift is a vote against the Wonkette hegemony.”

    Fuck you, Jon - our hegemony rulz.

  3. JayRodriguez says at 4:01 pm, January 8th, 2009

    I wonder if the Grammies are taking notes on how to make an award ceremony relevant. Well…talked about, at least.

  4. BeRightBack says at 4:01 pm, January 8th, 2009

    I’m sorry, but Josh has his own fanbase that is certainly augmented, but certainly not dependent on, his Wonkette fanbase. This post just sesrved to remind me to vote CC today.

  5. StephanieInCA says at 4:04 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Seriously guys? ~synthesis~? I mean, It’s a good blog, if you “care” about “facts,” which I clearly don’t.

  6. PerhapsSo says at 4:04 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Haha, you are of indeterminate sex.

  7. CivicHoliday says at 4:04 pm, January 8th, 2009

    P.S. You wrote, Jon, that “Wonkette needs to learn to wield its power with the same discretion that President Bush has shown.”

    Fine. Done and done. We shall now electrocute your nads, and carpet bomb The Confluence.

  8. Mustang says at 4:05 pm, January 8th, 2009

    “got their legions of readers, who apparently have a lot of time on their hands,”

    That’s harsh! We just don’t know how to do anything else. Also Jon Swift refers to Wonkette as “he”. Is Wonkette a he? Did someone look under Wonkette’s tail?

  9. hrhkingfriday says at 4:05 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Well, its 4pm and daytime tv is over. Time for the PUMAs to come out!

  10. Dave J. says at 4:06 pm, January 8th, 2009

    All I know is that next year we will have a computerized BCS system for the Weblog awards, and that President of Computers Nate Silver (TM) will set up the system and it will be foolproof.

  11. Mustang says at 4:06 pm, January 8th, 2009

    CivicHoliday: It’s a fair and balanced hegemony.

  12. Kev-O-Tron says at 4:07 pm, January 8th, 2009

    This hegemony stuff is pretty sweet actually. Who knew fascism could be so funny?

  13. Arthur B. Ablabab says at 4:08 pm, January 8th, 2009

    This blogwar has given me reason to live through 2009. I can’t vote without starbursting all over my confluence(that IS the new word for taint, right?).

  14. Kev-O-Tron says at 4:09 pm, January 8th, 2009

    hrhkingfriday: All fifty PUMAs are currently changing out of their track suits and into their eating pants while the TV dinners thaw.

  15. I have exercised the franchise, but I think I pulled a muscle doing so.

  16. I’ll throw him a pity fuck, errr, handjob, errrr, vote, I mean vote, just for his keen observations about PUMA:
    “The Confluence is a PUMA blog, which are blogs written by bitter and angry former Hillary Clinton supporters who are still getting used to the idea of having a black man in the White House. (PUMA either stands for “Party Unity My Ass” or “People Unable to Mitigate their Anger,” depending on whom you ask.) Now I understand that there are many people who disagree with PUMAs, but haven’t they suffered enough? Hillary lost and one day they are going to figure that out. I think we should give them a little time to adjust. Just as my grandmother learned to say “colored,” they’ll come around.”

  17. ManchuCandidate says at 4:11 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Fear Wonkette and the TruckNutz Hordes!

  18. CivicHoliday says at 4:12 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Arthur B. Ablabab: wait a minute, how can you starburst on your taint? do you have one of those newfangled up-side-down penii? my husband’s starbursts are always northbound…

  19. norbizness says at 4:13 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Dim: Yes, and I’ve a few questions I’d like to ask Cardinal (Jonathan) so-called Richelieu (Swift).

    Cardinal (Swift): Bonjour (Hello) Monsieur (Mr.) Dim.

    Dim: So-called Cardinal (Jonathan), I put it to you that you died in December 1642 (October 1745).

    Cardinal (Swift): That is correct.

    Dim: Ah-ha! He fell for my little trap. (court applauds and the Cardinal [Swift] looks dismayed)

    Cardinal (Swift): Curse you Inspector Dim. You are too clever for us naughty people.

  20. hrhkingfriday says at 4:13 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Kev-O-Tron: After that its feed the cat(s) and bitch on the interwebs. Fun!

  21. CivicHoliday says at 4:14 pm, January 8th, 2009

    WendyK: that was pretty much the only sensible thing he said in that entire thread

  22. BeRightBack says at 4:17 pm, January 8th, 2009

    BeRightBack: Why are you so humorless? And why can’t you spell?

  23. Obamaton says at 4:17 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Didn’t someone tell him this is a WARBLOG!!1!!

  24. WadISay says at 4:21 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Has Wonkette thought about auctioning off its endorsement on E-bay?

  25. Jim - why don’t you offer up Jon a weekly column as Wonkette’s own ‘lightning rod conservative’? This can be in deference to the forthcoming fairness doctrine. One of his sentences make a lot more sense than any of Kristols

    Sorry Josh, I like you, but Jon’s been getting my all my votes all week. He’s a swell guy

  26. Sussemilch says at 4:23 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Screw that internet award shit and give me more fatheaded politicians to laugh at.

  27. PerhapsSo says at 4:26 pm, January 8th, 2009

    WadISay: Wonkette’s endorsement is a fucking valuable thing, you just don’t give it away for nothing. If they don’t get what they want, then they will parachute themselves there.

  28. CivicHoliday says at 4:26 pm, January 8th, 2009

    wow, ok, well I do have some newfound respect for Jon after once again skimming through his “Best Blog Posts of 2008″ and finding this gem:

    http://membracid.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/i-have-pubic-lice-in-my-mailbox/

    Who, other than Riverchuky, would actually BUY this horror?

  29. Can’t we use our Wonkette powers to somehow move Jon Swift to the Conservative Blog category, then none of us would be conflicted about voting for him?

  30. Fuck Him! Let the clumsy, bullying continue unabated.

  31. Texan Bulldoggette says at 4:31 pm, January 8th, 2009

    From one of their posters:

    Anonymous said…

    Wonkette is filled with UNEMPLOYED COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS.

    No really they just have more fans and drawing power.
    1/08/2009 1:21 PM

    Nah, we’re just jaded, cynical, alcoholic smart-asses who believe the worst about people & like to make fun of, well, everyone.

  32. PerhapsSo says at 4:31 pm, January 8th, 2009

    CivicHoliday: There is like this whole world of crazy bug people out there that I didn’t know about and don’t really understand. I’m in awe of that blog post.

  33. I am uncomfortable with this new role as kingmaker. If by uncomfortable, one means “totally friggin psyched.” Woo hoo!

    This is soooooo much easier than ecodriving.

  34. undermedicated says at 4:31 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Seems that Jon Swift doesn’t like being collateral damage in the mother of all blog wars.

    Speaking of collateral damage, is Joe the Plumber a smoking crater yet?

  35. bitchincamaro says at 4:32 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Kev-O-Tron: Hahaha! “Eating pants”. That’s rich and rewarding. WIN.

  36. Arthur B. Ablabab says at 4:36 pm, January 8th, 2009

    CivicHoliday: soft & spontaneous. not your run-of-the-mill starbursts

  37. CivicHoliday says at 4:38 pm, January 8th, 2009

    PerhapsSo: Indeed. Do you think this product, if marketed better, could appeal to the furries? Little friends for lonely people in fake fur?

  38. shortsshortsshorts says at 4:38 pm, January 8th, 2009

    I checked out his blog for the first time, and BY GOLLY that SWIFT gentleman is very funny. I will join him AGAIN.

  39. He used the word “Dooced”. Props!

  40. CivicHoliday says at 4:43 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Arthur B. Ablabab: Hmm. I see. Well perhaps you’d be more accurate to call it a “stardribble”

  41. Scandalabra says at 4:46 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Confluence is where Denial River flows into the Bay of Bitterness.

  42. Jim, Jim, why have you foresaken me? (sob)

    Oh wait, am I still winning by a grillion points? Oh, never mind. SUCK IT SWIFT.

  43. Joey Ratz says at 5:00 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Bah. Too long and only occasionally funny. He did, however, remind me to give Informed Comment a vote. Thanks, Jon Swift!

    jfruh: Include more Family Circus, and you’ll have my next vote as well. Get to it!

  44. gjdodger says at 5:05 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Guys like Jon Swift don’t understand. We have nothing to do all day but participate in meaningless Internet votes. In fact, I claim personal responsibility for all those Black Hawks and Ducks on the NHL Western Conference All-Star Team.

  45. Scandalabra: Sometimes I worry that I’m too harsh on the gentle PUMAs or that some of them are (through no fault of their own) semi-reasonable people.

    But then I remember I don’t really care and that they’re only worth thinking about so long as it entertains me to do so.

    And that’s why I’m hella cool and they’re probably still blogging about the Wonkette with grim, teary-eyed seriousness.

  46. Wow, everyone else is taking this contest way too seriously. It’s like the People’s Choice Awards of the internet, and we all know that winners of the People’s Choice Awards are always the most deserving artists in their selected fields. (Ashlee Simpson iz teh rulz!) By destroying what little legitimacy this glorified online poll had, we’re doing the internet a service.

    So Jon, go back to being the only truly readable conservative blog and stop worrying about this stupid contest.

  47. Origami says at 5:05 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Weblog award season is a very dramatic and stressful time for bloggers!

  48. jagorev says at 5:15 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Sorry, but I’ve never read this “Jon Swift” fellow, and Josh has given me larfs for that last four years or so.

  49. Blue Gal says at 5:23 pm, January 8th, 2009

    So when exactly will Wonkette endorse the only blog standing between victory and a crazy right wing Bush-loving nun wannabee?

    Folks. Folks. <a href=”http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-individual-blogger/”Vote Driftglass for best individual blogger.

    Here’s a quote from the current frontrunner, The Anchoress:

    “I. Love. Boosh. Deal with it. I think we’ll miss him, in many ways, when he departs and even you folks on the left should be somewhat impressed (if you can be at all generous) at the predictably classy, gentlemanly way he is having his administration assist in the transition to Obama.”

    If that isn’t ironic enough for you, check out her category “Vaginal musings.”

    Folks. Folks. <a href=”http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-individual-blogger/”Vote Driftglass for best individual blogger.

  50. Hostile Michigander says at 5:25 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Sorry, “Jon Swift,” if that is your real name. Wonkette readers don’t support whiners.

    But that reminds me: Isn’t it time Wonkette endorsed some inadequate male blogs in more than four categories? In “Best Pet Blog,” I assume I should vote against any blog that likes cats, but I’m stuck on “Best Food Blog.” Which goes better with assfucking jokes? Cake Wrecks or The 99 Cent Chef?

  51. saucemaster says at 5:40 pm, January 8th, 2009

    much like those kiddie porn pageants that killed jon benet ramsey, the very fact that some blogger is crying that they aren’t winning this important award is proof that they shouldn’t get it.

  52. I’ve read Jon Swift before. He is quite entertaining and an all around good guy. Throw him some love, along with Comics Curmudgeon.

  53. Texan Bulldoggette: Oh, I figured that was one of us calling ourselves unemployed community organizers

  54. Blue Gal: Well, that’s convincing…Done.

  55. AWOcoholic says at 5:47 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Wow. That really escalated quickly.

    I actually really like Jon Swift’s blog. I’ve added it to my regular check’s after Wonkette linked to it last week.

  56. Hostile Michigander: the Pumas are pro-Cake Wrecks, therefore count me out

  57. AWOcoholic says at 6:15 pm, January 8th, 2009

    You guys we made a mistake! For “Best New Blog” we randomly selected ~synthesis~ which is kinda boring to usurp UppidyWoman or whatever. But there’s one called “Sassy Bitch Society” (!) and it’s totally sweet. Check it: http://sassybitchsociety.blogspot.com/

  58. Bruno: What, did they link to goatse.cx? That’s so old.

  59. Blue Gal: Sounds good to me! I’d much rather piss off a crazy right-winger than a bunch of Hillary Clinton dead-enders anytime.

  60. LittlePig says at 6:36 pm, January 8th, 2009

    What?! “Grace the Spot” is a LESBIAN blog?! Wonketteers, we need to bail on pointed-headed ~synthesis~ and give the lesbians some love.

  61. problemwithcaring says at 7:08 pm, January 8th, 2009

    You know, I am realizing two things. There are a lot of fucking good blogs on the internet. And that I don’t have enough time to care about them.

  62. LittlePig says at 7:39 pm, January 8th, 2009

    I gotta admit that sassybitchsociety blog is pretty damn funny.

  63. undermedicated says at 7:52 pm, January 8th, 2009

    I’m realizing three things.

    One, the blogwars are fun, reminds me of my days as a Hatfield shootin’ them McCoy chilluns with rocksalt. Fortunately nobody here has a job, or at least one that requires any time spent working.

    Two, the pumas apparently don’t know why we don’t like them (their stupidity is the gift that keeps on giving and they are now turning on each other (I’m sure nobody is spoofing any accounts over there, naah) — from http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/wonktards-beware-%E2%80%B9%E2%80%BA-%E2%80%B9%E2%80%A2%C2%BF%E2%80%A2%E2%80%BA-%E2%80%B9%E2%80%BA/#comment-265374

    38. hrc, on January 7th, 2009 at 11:46 am Said:
    Interesting that myiq2xu’s IP address matches the one posting at Wonkette calling women “whores”
    and “cum receptacles.”

    39. myiq2xu, on January 7th, 2009 at 11:48 am Said:
    hrc: Really? What’s my IP address and how did you get it?

    40. myiq2xu, on January 7th, 2009 at 11:58 am Said:
    Why would a Wonkette moderator be living in Sun Valley California?
    Wonkette is a DC based blog.
    (I can see IP addresses here too, and whois will trace them)

    Comments are closed.

    (Question, myiq2xu — double agent or triple agent?)

    Three, the pumas are now working the refs:

    http://weblogawards.proboards85.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=816&page=1

  64. CivicHoliday says at 8:05 pm, January 8th, 2009

    undermedicated: indeed, myiq2xu is a mystery to us all. he/she obviously did not have his/her tail properly snipped after birth and have had a complex ever since.

  65. chascates says at 8:15 pm, January 8th, 2009

    undermedicated: From the PUMA posturing:

    “Wonkette is clearly in the wrong category. It makes no attempt to be a liberal blog, it is a humor & snark political blog that targets everyone with equal vitriol (except Barack Obama)
    If it were a liberal blog, would the use of homophobic misogynist and ageist language in comments be the rule and not the exception? Would the moderators on that blog allow it to stand unquestioned. Clearly it is not a liberal blog as it does not meet any of the criteria.”

    “The Confluence is a liberal blog. We are FDR/JFK style Democrats.”

    I didn’t realize estrogen was such an extreme psychedelic.

  66. Boondock Saint says at 9:15 pm, January 8th, 2009

    “spiteful shenanigans.” “Wonketeers”. Obviously, you dirty fuckers don’t know when enough is enough. Now we’re being called spiteful shenaniganders. Very nice. What will the rest of the internets think of us?

  67. undermedicated says at 9:41 pm, January 8th, 2009

    chascates: Libruls can’t be homophobic, misogynistic, or ageist? That is way fucked up. I was lied to. When I went to Wonketeer boot camp, that dirty, spiteful shenanigander of a drill sergeant told us just the opposite, or I’d have packed the entire company’s cache of trucknutz in my footlocker and gone AWOL fershure.

  68. FreshCliches says at 10:30 pm, January 8th, 2009

    Boondock Saint: What’s good for the spiteful shenanigoose….

  69. undermedicated: They think we’re “trying hard” to win.

    Must these people always be so wrong about everything?

  70. shortsshortsshorts says at 2:31 am, January 9th, 2009

    Boondock Saint: I talked to the interwebs earlier today, and she totally wants to get down on all of us. Filthy whore, that interwebs.

  71. And place a vote for Driftglass in the best individual blog category, too— or else someone named Jesus might win–yes, THAT Jesus, not some shifty-eyed wetback named “Hey! Zeus!”.

    ps, if it is helpful, all you need to know is that Driftglass field dresses and skins wingtards for a living

    http://driftglass.blogspot.com/

    http://2008.weblogawards.org/polls/best-individual-blogger/

  72. JadedDIssonance says at 11:20 am, January 9th, 2009

    PUMAs talk about Rape too much.

Leave a Reply