WASHINGTON, DC, 09:36 PM, MON NOVEMBER 23 | Advertise on Wonkette | tips@wonkette.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS
DEPT. OF YOUR BLOG SUCKS

  • NOW WHAT: Ooh looky, the word “Wonkette” was used once in one article in today’s liberal New York Times: “Stranger still, the birth of Cute Overload was almost purely accidental. Meg Frost, a 36-year-old design manager at Apple, started cuteoverload.com three years ago to test Web software. Within months, it became an online institution, drawing about 88,000 unique visitors a day — about the same as the political gossip blog Wonkette.” Delightful. The lesson: even websites that manage to be shittier than Wonkette can attract very large followings. [NYT]


9:50 AM on Wed August 20 2008
By Jim Newell
513 Views

  1. loquaciousmusic says at 9:54 am, August 20th, 2008

    Hah hah! By mistake, I went to CuteOverlord.com! I must be a Wonkette reader!

  2. Godless Liberal * says at 9:57 am, August 20th, 2008

    Even cuteoverload.com does not contain the adorableness that is Bill Kristol.

  3. Serolf Divad says at 10:03 am, August 20th, 2008

    Holy crap! They’ve got a cat with four ears on there now. They should rename the site creepoverload.com.

  4. Dr. Spaceman says at 10:12 am, August 20th, 2008

    You dump on CuteOverload at your own peril, Newell. Watch yourself, or you’ll never enjoy a snorgle again.

  5. freakishlystrong says at 10:22 am, August 20th, 2008

    Nothin’ cute and fuzzy here, we’re all sharp and pointy…

  6. Johnny Zhivago says at 10:26 am, August 20th, 2008

    Sites like fluffyslitterboxcam.com and whatsbehindmysofa.net get more views than Wonkette every day, but it doesn’t mean they have any redeeming value.

  7. The Incomparable Tiny Valdez says at 10:26 am, August 20th, 2008

    I’m switching my default home page from NY Times to CuteOverload.

  8. SayItWithWookies says at 10:26 am, August 20th, 2008

    Serolf Divad: You must’ve gone to mutationoverload.com by mistake.

  9. If I hadn’t just gone over there, though, I’d never heave learned about the Tiddy Bear! Wonkette needs more stuffed animals stuffed in cleavage!

  10. tiny mexican says at 10:35 am, August 20th, 2008

    Godless Liberal *: Or do they?

  11. tiny mexican says at 10:35 am, August 20th, 2008
  12. NoWireHangers says at 10:41 am, August 20th, 2008

    Don’t hate on the Cuteoverload. I loves that website. Makes me feel clean and pure after diving into the putrid waters that are Our Wonkette.

  13. Serolf Divad says at 10:44 am, August 20th, 2008

    NoWireHangers:

    And vicey versie.

  14. Anita Cocktail says at 11:10 am, August 20th, 2008

    I’m the kind of modern gal that can go from the snark to the snorgle and back again…I mean, really, isn’t a cute wittle kitteh worth a thousand snarling Hillarys or Botoxed McCain foreheads?

  15. NoWireHangers says at 11:26 am, August 20th, 2008

    I just popped over to Cute Overload and the top two posts are eerily similar to Wonkette: Yoda-speak and Wilford Brimley jokes.

  16. When you click on the Amazon.com link in the article, instead of taking you to the Cute Overload calendar, it takes you to an NYT corporate profile of AMZN. I hate that. Who designed these links, a strategy consultant? I’m so angry, I’m going to kill my subscription to the Times (ha! like I’ve ever subscribed to a newspaper!) and buy the CuteOverload calendar, and I’m not even a lonely, angsty 18-34 yr old female college grad.

  17. WhatTheHeck says at 11:36 am, August 20th, 2008

    Jim, so you are saying Wonkette is a shitty website, even though there are others that are shittier.
    Well Wonkette is the sum of its shitty parts. Us. HaHaHa.

  18. celticagent says at 11:57 am, August 20th, 2008

    I do not think Wonkette is a “shitty website” as you put it. I always enjoy reading your articles and posts! You make me laugh regularly. Keep ‘em coming.

  19. pdiddycornchips says at 12:02 pm, August 20th, 2008

    only 88,000 unique views a day? There’s a simple way to increase those views. Three words. More. Ass. Fucking.

  20. Johnny Zhivago: And Wonkette’s redeeming value is? Thinking. Thinking some more. Still thinking. Feeling a blinding headache behind my eyes. Now vomitting on my shoes. Thinking slowing down. Coma.

  21. NoWireHangers: I see your point. It’s so cleansing to visit after a swim in the turgid intellectual mire that is teh Wonkette: http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/geeross/index.html
    Speaking of intellectual mire, where’s our latest Paultard poster, “[Miss] Liberty”?

  22. NoWireHangers says at 12:19 pm, August 20th, 2008

    S.Luggo: How’d they get that picture of my apartment?

  23. loquaciousmusic: CuteOverlord.com suggests these related searches: Russian Wife, Women, Bunny Costume, Cat Toys, Car Insurance, Cats, Make Love, Dog Lover, Gift, Dog Cat, Russian Brides.

    This ontology disturbs me. Especially “Dog Cat.”

  24. moneypenny says at 1:04 pm, August 20th, 2008

    CuteOverload owns.

  25. Politicalchef says at 2:37 pm, August 20th, 2008

    Longtime reader, first time commenter: Shittier than wonkette was four years ago, when you actually broke news? Yes. Shittier than wonkette now? Sorry. Cuteoverload knows its subject, owns its subject, and is constantly finding new ways of explicating that subject. But don’t worry, I read Wonkette every day. I don’t know why, but I do.

  26. simonblehs says at 1:22 am, August 21st, 2008

    Forget breaking news, how about writing anything worth reading?

    >The lesson: even websites that manage to be shittier than Wonkette can attract very large followings.

    The funny thing is that once, Wonkette was a hilarious, brilliantly written blog. It was a *must-read* for everybody in DC. Now it’s nothing but dorm-room (or basement) screeds written by an obnoxious, frat-boy hack. It’s nothing. It means nothing. It’s utterly ineffectual.

    I know that if it were me who took over Wonkette and ran it into the ground this horribly, I wouldn’t dare make fun of any other sites anywhere. If *my* site were being eclipsed by a cute-animal site, I wouldn’t dare say anything bad about anyone anywhere, ever. In fact, I’d be so thoroughly humiliated, I’d have to give it up entirely. Out of whatever pride I might have left.

    So. I’m glad I’m not you. Glad I’m not a complete failure. Not a complete laughingstock. Not a washout.

    Oh, and in case that didn’t sufficiently insult you because you failed to understand any of it: You, uh, liberal you.

Leave a Reply